This month’s news featured a horrifying story of a serious fire at a 159-unit condominium building in Calgary. We’ve come up with 5 lessons from this story.
Continue Reading 5 lessons from Calgary condo fire
Case Studies
Tackling rude, disrespectful conduct
We are seeing an increase in human rights claims relating to bad service or poor treatment by the condo board or manager. Here are some comments and tips.
Continue Reading Tackling rude, disrespectful conduct
Toronto Hydro censured for illegal condo hookup practices
The OEB has ruled against Toronto Hydro’s practice of refusing to connect hydro service to the bulk meters of new condominium projects unless all units in the condominium are individually smart-metered by Toronto Hydro.
Continue Reading Toronto Hydro censured for illegal condo hookup practices
Condo lien is not slander of title when the owner is in arrears
Unit owners who have a problem about a condominium lien should get legal advice and then follow that advice. Here’s what happens when they don’t.
Continue Reading Condo lien is not slander of title when the owner is in arrears
Alberta case affirms powers of condo board
A February 2009 decision of the Alberta Court of Queen’s Bench should be added to the list of notable condo cases for 2009.
Continue Reading Alberta case affirms powers of condo board
Top 10 condo law cases of 2009
As 2009 drifts into the history books, we look back at some of the notable condo law decisions made by courts and tribunals in the year gone by.
Continue Reading Top 10 condo law cases of 2009
Court of Appeal smokes the “private club” defence
Anyone still trying to circumvent Ontario’s anti-smoking laws by operating as a “private club” should consider this recent advice from the Ontario Court of Appeal: Don’t bother.
Continue Reading Court of Appeal smokes the “private club” defence
Papers from ACMO Legal Grab Bag Luncheon
Here are the papers from the ACMO Legal Grab Bag luncheon held November 27, 2009.
Continue Reading Papers from ACMO Legal Grab Bag Luncheon
Modifying exclusive use common elements to accommodate disabilities: Who pays?
A recent decision of the Ontario Human Rights Tribunal offers guidance on who pays for changes made to exclusive use common elements for the purpose of accommodating physical disability.
Continue Reading Modifying exclusive use common elements to accommodate disabilities: Who pays?
The Supreme Court on directors’ fiduciary duty
In December 2008, the Supreme Court of Canada released its reasons in the case of BCE Inc. v. 1976 Debentureholders. The decision contains critically important lessons for condominium directors.
Continue Reading The Supreme Court on directors’ fiduciary duty
