Top 10 condo law cases of 2009
As 2009 drifts into the history books, we look back at some of the notable condo law decisions made by Ontario courts and tribunals in the year gone by.
Here are ten of them, in no particular order. Click the bolded case names to view full text decisions at Canadian Legal Information Institute ("CanLII").
#1 - Nipissing Condominium Corporation No. 4 v. Kilfoyl, 2009 CanLII 46654 (ON S.C.)
Corporation obtains a compliance order against owners operating a boarding house in violation of the “single family residence” provision in the declaration. The owners unsuccessfully claim that the case must first be mediated/arbitrated (as per Condo Act s. 134(2)), and that the single family use provision violates the Human Rights Code. The case is now under appeal.
#2 - Metropolitan Toronto Condominium Corporation No. 1250 v. Mastercraft Group Inc, 2009 ONCA 584 (CanLII)
The Court of Appeal makes important rulings on the following interesting issues in this nightmare case over a conversion building:
- When does a subsequent landowner become a “declarant”
- Whether fixtures can be separated from common elements by the declarant and then leased to the condo corporation
- What factors must be considered in determining whether a construction warranty is breached.
- Whether the right to rent a parking spot is an easement appurtenant to each residential unit
Application for leave to appeal this case has been made to the Supreme Court of Canada [and dismissed].
Continue Reading...
Anyone still trying to circumvent Ontario’s anti-smoking laws by operating as a “private club” should consider this recent advice from our Court of Appeal: Don’t bother..jpg)
